Communiction Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 4

Communiction Theories - Essay Example For example, the phrase â€Å"Where are you going†, without the question mark will be read flatly whereas, when written in the form, â€Å"Where are you going?†; there is an indication that the speaker should have a falling pitch. Moreover, the importance of punctuation marks are seen in the meanings relayed in the sentences. For instance, â€Å"They are Grants sisters† and â€Å"They are Grant’s sisters† imply different meanings where the former presents two probable corrections. First, it may be considered that the writer missed a word and can be corrected as â€Å"They are the Grants sisters† meaning, they are the sisters from the Grants family. Secondly, it could be edited to form the second sentence with the apostrophe, distinctly stating that they are the sisters of Grant. It is vital not only to place the punctuation marks on the right places but also to use the correct punctuation mark because they can change the tone of a sentence which consequently will change the meaning of the sentence. â€Å"You are good.†, is a statement. â€Å"You are good!†, indicates an excited feeling towards the person being appreciated. â€Å"You are good?†, poses a challeng ing tone to the person being referred to regarding goodness. These few examples show how punctuation marks affect communication so much that students and professionals alike are drawn to the study of

Drawing on academic theories and examples from practice, critically Essay

Drawing on academic theories and examples from practice, critically explore if diversity and inclusion make business sense - Essay Example Providing opportunities on the basis of differences in class, race, gender, religion or language is considered unjustifiable. Equality of opportunity is one of the forms of social equality and is best expressed in the phrase â€Å"career open to talents†. It means that individuals should attain public opportunities that they deserve because of the talent they possess and their achievements; color, nationality, religion, gender or any such corresponding characteristic should not hinder their progress. Consequently, equality of opportunity simply demonstrates the concept of equality before the law. The concept allows freedom to accompany an individual’s private interest or ambition without any arbitrary constraints based on inappropriate personal attributes. A good example from practice could be that of matrimony. An individual has every right to marry under any circumstances but it is not necessary that he gets whatever he desires for as his wife. In business, it means f reedom to engage in trade. However, it doesn’t give one a right to force someone else to give you a chance in his trade. In a nutshell, equality of outcome is a radically different concept. While equality of opportunity supports the idea that all individuals start at the same time, the concept of equality of outcome makes sure that all finish at the same time. It provides differentiated policies to social groups that have been disadvantaged. It is different from equality of opportunity which is a rather liberal approach and focuses on individuals rather than groups. The business case for  diversity formulates that in a global market, a firm taking on a diverse personnel (that includes both men and women, people from different generations, people from diverse backgrounds with respect to ethnicity and race, etc.) understands the enumeration of the marketplace it assists in a much better way and is and therefore has more chances of flourishing and surviving in that market than the one with a diminished variation in workforce statistics. A further consequence of this is that the employees working in a company approving of diversity are more satisfied; help in improving productivity and are more likely to be retained in the business. This contribution of the business case describes how a business makes use of its various diversities. In case of a diverse labor pool, if the span of this background is not recognized by the entrepreneur, then he might be able to enjoy the advantages following from diversity. Generally, the entrepreneurs are not authorized to consider ethnicity or race in recruiting the workforce. However, in case there is a ‘manifest imbalance’ in a ‘traditionally segregated job category’, the US Supreme Court has allowed for a limited selection on the basis of gender, ethnicity or race. Diversity in the workplace casts a special affluence, but also special confrontations. It is up to the organizations’ owners to make use of diversity in terms of an inspiring asset so as to boost organizational performance. C.L. Walck characterizes conducting diversity in the workplace as "Negotiating interaction across culturally diverse groups, and contriving to get along in an environment characterized by cultural diversity". Diversity benefits both the society and